Book
BOWEL ENDOMETRIOSIS

Bowel Endometriosis Surgery in Uberlândia, Brazil

When deep endometriosis infiltrates the rectum or the sigmoid colon, the operation involves the bowel. Dr. Solon performs the complete operation — excision of the pelvic implants, the bowel stage and, when indicated, hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy — by laparoscopy or robotic surgery.

Ask about bowel endometriosis on WhatsApp
Dr. Solon Gonçalves Souza Menezes, digestive system and robotic surgeon in Uberlândia, Brazil

Dr. Solon Gonçalves Souza Menezes

CRM-MG 79366 · RQE 60355 (Digestive System Surgery) · RQE 44656 (General Surgery)

Professor of Surgery — FAMED UFU · Robotic Surgery Certification (Intuitive / Albert Einstein Hospital) · Practices at Hospital UMC and Hospital Mater Dei Santa Genoveva, Uberlândia, Brazil · +55 (34) 99341-0915

Book Appointment

Endometriosis is the presence, outside the uterus, of tissue similar to the endometrium — the layer that lines the inside of the uterus. When this tissue forms nodules that infiltrate organs, it is called deep endometriosis; when the nodule reaches the muscular layer of the bowel wall, it is bowel endometriosis (lesions only on the surface of the bowel are considered peritoneal disease). Up to 37% of women with deep endometriosis are estimated to have bowel involvement, and the most affected segment is the rectosigmoid, followed by the distal small bowel. In a French national series of 1,135 women operated on for deep endometriosis of the rectum and sigmoid colon, the disease involved only the rectum in 56.8% of cases, the rectum and sigmoid in 36.3% and only the sigmoid in 6.9%; the cecum was also involved in 6.6% and the small bowel in 4.7%.

Sectional illustration of the female pelvis with the uterus, ovary, rectum and sigmoid colon and a deep endometriosis nodule infiltrating the rectal wall
Didactic illustrationSection of the female pelvis: the uterus and ovary in front, the rectum and sigmoid colon behind. The deep endometriosis nodule (highlighted) usually forms in the pouch between the uterus and the rectum and infiltrates the front wall of the rectum — the point where gynecological surgery and bowel surgery meet. Base illustration: BruceBlaus (Blausen Medical), CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons — adapted.

Symptoms tend to follow the menstrual cycle: pain on defecation (dyschezia), diarrhea or constipation during the period, bloating and, in some cases, rectal bleeding — on top of the severe period pain and pain during intercourse common to deep endometriosis. At a Brazilian referral center, pain on defecation and diarrhea during menstruation were associated with a higher likelihood of segmental bowel resection being indicated, where lesions were larger (median 3.1 cm versus 1.6 cm with shaving). Mapping is done by imaging with a dedicated protocol: in a meta-analysis of 30 studies (3,374 women), transvaginal ultrasound had a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 97% for rectosigmoid endometriosis, and MRI 86% and 96% — with the caveat that the studies were heterogeneous. With bowel preparation, ultrasound reaches 93% and 94% in a 2024 meta-analysis, and in a Brazilian study of 194 patients with suspected deep endometriosis it predicted infiltration of the submucosa or mucosa with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 94% — information that helps choose the technique before surgery. Colonoscopy assesses the mucosa — the innermost layer — so it is not the test that maps endometriosis; it is used when other bowel diseases need to be ruled out.

Not every case of bowel endometriosis needs surgery. Initial treatment is usually hormonal: in a Brazilian study of 238 women with rectosigmoid endometriosis treated with hormones first, 60.1% remained on medical treatment, and major complications occurred in 9.2% of the surgical group versus 0.6% of the medical group. Surgery is reserved for pain that does not respond to hormonal treatment, lesion growth and suspected bowel sub-obstruction — and, when there is infertility, the decision is made together with reproductive medicine. The European ESHRE guideline (2022) considers that surgical removal of deep endometriosis may reduce pain and improve quality of life (weak recommendation) and recommends, as good practice, referring women with deep endometriosis to a center of expertise. Studies comparing the same patient before and after surgery show improvement: in a review that pooled 17 studies, women operated on for bowel endometriosis improved in all 8 quality-of-life domains assessed, most of all in the pain domain; and in a prospective study of 175 women who underwent bowel resection, every pelvic pain parameter fell, with the largest drop in pain on defecation — studies without a non-operated control group.

Dr. Solon Gonçalves is a digestive tract surgeon (RQE 60355) and general surgeon (RQE 44656) and performs the complete operation for deep endometriosis involving the bowel — from excision of the pelvic implants to the bowel stage, including, when indicated, hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy — by laparoscopy or robotic surgery, at UMC Hospital and Mater Dei Santa Genoveva Hospital in Uberlândia, Brazil.

Book a consultation
THE DIGESTIVE TRACT SURGEON'S ROLE

From the pelvis to the bowel, in a single operation.

The 2020 joint recommendations of ESGE, ESHRE and WES (World Endometriosis Society) for the surgical treatment of deep endometriosis advise building the team according to the planned procedure: the gynecologist leads, and a bowel surgeon, a urologist or other specialists may need to take part; a multidisciplinary meeting before the operation may be helpful. If a stoma is anticipated, this should be discussed extensively with the patient, and the stoma site may be marked before surgery.

Dr. Solon performs the whole operation: excision of the deep endometriosis nodules in the pelvis — uterosacral ligaments, rectovaginal septum, vaginal wall and peritoneum —, hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy when indicated, and the bowel stage: choosing, based on imaging and the operative findings, between shaving, disc resection or segmental resection; suturing the rectum or performing the anastomosis; assessing the need for a protective stoma; and examining the whole bowel — the same recommendations advise inspecting the appendix, small bowel, cecum and ileocecal valve, because the disease is multifocal —, as well as following the recovery. When the ureter or bladder is involved, a urologist joins the team.

In the United States, in a national database of 745 colorectal resections for endometriosis, 82.3% were performed by general or colorectal surgeons and 17.7% by gynecologists; after adjustment, the specialty of the operating surgeon was not associated with major complications, and the authors suggest considering a multidisciplinary or dual-surgeon team when bowel resection is needed. In the ENDORE randomized trial, the multidisciplinary teams included three gynecologic surgeons, each with at least 120 operations for colorectal endometriosis, and five general surgeons with at least 5 years of experience in colorectal surgery, who performed every procedure requiring a bowel suture; rectal shaving was done by the gynecologic surgeon alone.

ASSOCIATED PROCEDURES

What can be done in the same operation.

The extent of surgery is defined beforehand, with the patient, based on imaging, age, the wish to become pregnant and symptoms. When indicated, the procedures below are performed by Dr. Solon in the same operation as the bowel stage; when the ureter or bladder is involved, a urologist takes part in the surgery.

01

Hysterectomy

Removal of the uterus, together with removal of all visible lesions, may be considered according to ESHRE in women who no longer wish to conceive and have not responded to more conservative treatments — and patients should know it does not necessarily cure the symptoms or the disease. At 7 years, 77.0% of women who had a hysterectomy with ovarian preservation were free of further surgery, versus 44.6% after local excision with ovarian preservation. Combined with a colorectal resection, however, hysterectomy was an independent factor for major complications (adjusted OR 2.59) in a US database of 755 operations.

02

Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy

Removing the tubes and ovaries reduces recurrence — in a series of 138 hysterectomies for endometriosis, women who kept ovarian tissue had a 6.1-fold higher risk of recurrent pain — but it induces surgical menopause: in the Nurses' Health Study, removing the ovaries at hysterectomy for benign disease was associated with higher all-cause mortality (HR 1.12) and more coronary heart disease. ESHRE advises weighing the long-term consequences of early menopause and the possible need for hormone replacement; the decision is individual and made with the patient before surgery.

03

Appendectomy

Endometriosis often involves the appendix: it was present in 39.0% of women with deep endometriosis whose appendix was removed during gynecological surgery, versus 11.6% of those with superficial disease, and in 35.8% of 67 patients with bowel resection and routine appendectomy, with no complications attributed to the appendectomy. Removal is discussed case by case; an abnormal-looking appendix is removed.

04

Peritoneal excision and peritonectomy

Peritoneal implants are removed together with the deep nodules. ESHRE considers excision rather than cauterization (ablation) to reduce pain (weak recommendation, low-quality evidence); in minimal to mild disease, the meta-analysis of randomized trials found no difference in pain between the two. Systematic posterior compartment peritonectomy was assessed in a pilot study of 54 patients without a comparison group — and the authors themselves call for a randomized trial.

05

Ureter and bladder

At a university hospital, 52.6% of 213 patients with deep endometriosis had urinary tract involvement; when the ureter was involved, symptoms were non-specific. Ureteral endometriosis can be silent and, if diagnosed late, lead to loss of kidney function; surgical treatment ranges from freeing the ureter (ureterolysis) to resection with anastomosis or reimplantation, with a urologist taking part.

06

Vagina

When the nodule crosses the septum between the vagina and the rectum, excision includes the vaginal wall — 33% of operations in the French national series. With simultaneous vaginal and rectal sutures, rectovaginal fistula occurred in 8.5% of 363 patients; in that study, the center that created protective stomas more often (71.4% vs 30.3%) did not have a significantly lower fistula rate, and the main factor was a rectal suture within 8 cm of the anus. The ESGE/ESHRE/WES recommendations allow a temporary stoma in this setting, and the decision is individual.

BOWEL TECHNIQUES

Shaving, disc or segmental resection.

The technique is chosen by the depth, size and number of nodules, the distance from the anus and the operative findings — and the three are not interchangeable: the rates below reflect lesions of different sizes. The ESGE/ESHRE/WES recommendations state that a lesion limited to the serosa can be treated with superficial excision; one reaching the muscular layer requires partial or full-thickness removal, by shaving, disc resection or segmental resection.

The ENDORE randomized trial (60 patients with rectal nodules longer than 20 mm, up to 15 cm from the anus) showed no statistically significant difference in bowel and urinary function between conservative surgery — shaving or disc — and segmental resection at 2 years (at least one functional problem in 48.1% vs 39.4%), and segmental resection was associated with more stenosis; at 10 years, there was also no significant difference in rectal recurrence (7.4% vs 3.6%) or reoperation. It is a small trial with wide confidence intervals — which is why the choice is individual.

TechniqueWhat it isWhen it is usedPublished complicationsRecurrence
ShavingShaving the nodule off the bowel wall without opening the bowel lumenMore superficial nodulesMean rate 2.2%; less rectovaginal fistula than disc (OR 0.19) and segmental resection (OR 0.26); rectovaginal fistula 1.3% in the French seriesThe highest of the three (OR 5.53 vs segmental)
Disc resectionRemoval of a full-thickness disc of the wall, with suture of the openingSmaller nodules reaching the deep layersMean rate 9.7%; rectovaginal fistula 3.6% in the French series; less stenosis than segmental (OR 0.15)Similar to segmental resection
Segmental resectionRemoval of the bowel segment containing the nodule and joining of the ends (anastomosis)Larger or multiple nodules, or nodules narrowing the bowelMean rate 9.9%; rectovaginal fistula 3.9%; low anterior resection syndrome in 5.6% (4.0% major); more urinary dysfunction than conservative techniques (OR 0.37 in their favor)Lower than shaving; similar to disc

On a phone, drag the table sideways to see all the columns.

Sources: Keckstein et al., Hum Reprod Open 2020 (ESGE/ESHRE/WES); Roman et al., Hum Reprod 2018 and Am J Obstet Gynecol 2026 (ENDORE, 2 and 10 years); Bendifallah et al., J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021 (complications; 17 studies in the rectovaginal fistula meta-analysis and 5 in the stenosis meta-analysis) and 2020 (recurrence; 4 studies); O'Brien et al., Int J Colorectal Dis 2023 (17 comparative studies, 2,861 patients with rectal involvement: less recurrence with resection, similar function); Roman et al., J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2017 (French series of 1,135 cases); Coll et al., Colorectal Dis 2025 (124 segmental resections); Madar et al., Updates Surg 2025 (urinary dysfunction, 22 studies).
ROBOTIC SURGERY

The role of robotics: where it helps and where it has shown no advantage.

Bowel endometriosis surgery can be performed entirely by laparoscopy or by robotic surgery — what changes is the instrument, not the bowel technique. In the French national series, conventional laparoscopy was used in 82.2% of operations, robotics in 9.7% and open surgery in 8.1%. The robotic platform offers magnified three-dimensional vision, articulated instruments and tremor filtering, which may make dissection in the deep pelvis — between the rectum, the vagina and the ureters — and suturing easier. The ESGE/ESHRE/WES recommendations say exactly this: robotic instruments may facilitate difficult steps, but several studies have shown results equivalent to, not better than, conventional laparoscopy in deep endometriosis.

The only randomized trial, LAROSE, compared the two approaches in women with suspected endometriosis scheduled for surgery (not specifically bowel disease): operative time was similar (106.6 vs 101.6 minutes) and there was no difference in blood loss, complications or conversion to open surgery. In the 2025 meta-analysis specific to colorectal endometriosis, robotics took about 21.5 minutes longer on average, with no difference in blood loss, length of stay, conversion or overall complication rate — and the authors regard laparoscopy as the gold standard, with robotics as a potential alternative. In the most recent meta-analysis, from 2026, laparoscopy was 22.2 minutes faster in the bowel subgroup (only 2 studies).

One signal in favor of robotics appeared in urinary function: in a meta-analysis of 10 studies (728 patients) of colorectal endometriosis surgery, postoperative voiding dysfunction was less frequent after robotics (4.4% vs 13.3%) — an association that still needs confirmation in randomized trials. Cost is higher: at a referral center, disposable material for colorectal resection cost 14% more with the robot. For the surgeon, there is an ergonomic gain, with lower physical load on some muscle groups and lower cognitive load in a review of 10 studies (not specific to endometriosis), with very low-certainty evidence and no demonstrated outcome for the patient.

In practice, Dr. Solon performs both approaches and discusses the choice with the team and with the patient, case by case, based on the extent of the disease, the need for deep pelvic dissection and the team's experience — without presenting the robot as a universal solution.

PREPARATION AND RECOVERY

What to expect before and after surgery.

Preoperative preparation

Planning starts with mapping — transvaginal ultrasound with bowel preparation or MRI with an endometriosis protocol — which shows the size and number of nodules, the layer of the bowel wall involved, the distance from the anus and other sites in the ureter, bladder or appendix. Based on this, Dr. Solon defines the extent of surgery — including whether hysterectomy or removal of the tubes and ovaries is indicated — and discusses with the patient the likely bowel technique and the possibility of a protective stoma. ESHRE recommends against hormonal treatment before surgery with the aim of improving the outcome on pain. Preparation includes blood tests, anesthetic assessment, fasting and, usually, bowel preparation.

Recovery and postoperative care

Recovery depends on the technique and extent: after shaving, the hospital stay is usually shorter; after disc or segmental resection, diet is reintroduced gradually and the patient is monitored for signs of fistula, which may appear in the first weeks. Temporary changes in bowel habit and urination are followed up — in the French series, 8.6% needed bladder catheterization after recovery or had an increased urinary residual. If a protective stoma was created, it is closed in a second operation once healing is confirmed. Hormonal treatment after surgery may be offered to women who do not wish to conceive immediately: in a meta-analysis of premenopausal women who kept at least one ovary, hormonal suppression started within 6 weeks of surgery reduced the risk of recurrence (RR 0.41).

RISKS AND COMPLICATIONS

Major surgery, with known risks.

Risks vary with the technique and the extent of disease. The figures below come from the series and meta-analyses cited in the references and are discussed with the patient before the operation.

  • Rectovaginal fistula — a connection between the rectum and the vagina: 2.7% in the French series (1.3% after shaving, 3.6% after disc and 3.9% after segmental resection); 8.5% when excision requires simultaneous vaginal and rectal sutures, with 3.4 times higher odds when the rectal suture lies within 8 cm of the anus. Repair may require further surgery.
  • Bowel fistula or leak — in a series of 1,102 patients, bowel fistula (rectovaginal or leak) occurred in 3.4%, and opening the rectal lumen increased the risk compared with shaving (adjusted OR 6.8 for disc and 4.8 for segmental resection); anastomotic leak occurred in 0.8% of all cases in the French series.
  • Protective stoma — temporary, created in 19.1% (French series) to 21.8% (series of 1,102 patients) to protect low sutures; it is closed in a second operation.
  • Urinary dysfunction — need for catheterization after recovery or increased urinary residual in 8.6% in the French series; less frequent with conservative techniques than with segmental resection (OR 0.37).
  • Changes in bowel habit — after segmental resection, low anterior resection syndrome (urgency and fragmented bowel movements) in 5.6% of 124 patients (4.0% major); anastomotic stenosis is less frequent after disc than after segmental resection (OR 0.15).
  • Pelvic abscess — 3.4% in the French series.
  • Major complications overall — 13.5% of 755 colorectal resections for endometriosis in a US database, more frequent with open surgery (20.4%) than laparoscopy (9.9%) and when hysterectomy was added; in the French series of 1,135 patients there was 1 death (0.1%).
  • Recurrence — higher after shaving (OR 5.53 vs segmental); 32.7% of ENDORE patients had further endometriosis-related surgery within 10 years.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common questions about this procedure.

Does all bowel endometriosis need surgery?+

No. Initial treatment is usually hormonal, and many patients do well on it: in a Brazilian study of 238 women with rectosigmoid endometriosis, 60.1% remained on medical treatment. Surgery is indicated when pain does not respond to hormones, when the lesion grows or when bowel sub-obstruction is suspected; with infertility, the decision is made with reproductive medicine.

Which doctor treats and who operates on bowel endometriosis?+

The diagnosis and medical treatment of endometriosis are usually managed by the gynecologist. Surgery for deep endometriosis involving the bowel may be performed by a gynecologist experienced in deep endometriosis, a digestive tract surgeon or a colorectal surgeon, alone or as a team: the ESGE/ESHRE/WES recommendations advise building the team according to the planned procedure, and in a US database of 745 colorectal resections for endometriosis the specialty of the operating surgeon was not associated with major complications. Dr. Solon, a digestive tract surgeon, performs the complete operation, including hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy when indicated; if the ureter or bladder is involved, a urologist takes part.

Will I need a colostomy bag?+

In most operations, no. When created, the stoma is protective and temporary — in 19.1% to 21.8% of patients in the large series — and is closed in a second operation. It is more likely when the rectal suture is very low or when there are simultaneous vaginal and rectal sutures. The possibility is discussed before surgery, and the site can be marked in advance.

Does bowel endometriosis show on colonoscopy? Which test detects it?+

The tests that map bowel endometriosis are transvaginal ultrasound and MRI with an endometriosis protocol. In a meta-analysis of 30 studies, transvaginal ultrasound had a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 97%, and MRI 86% and 96%; with bowel preparation, ultrasound reached 93% and 94% in a 2024 meta-analysis. Colonoscopy assesses the mucosa, the innermost layer, so it does not map the disease; it is used when other causes of bowel symptoms need to be ruled out.

Is bowel endometriosis cancer?+

No. Endometriosis is a benign disease. But bowel symptoms such as bleeding and changes in bowel habit need to be investigated to rule out other bowel diseases — including tumors — before they are attributed to endometriosis.

How is bowel endometriosis surgery performed?+

By laparoscopy or robotic surgery, through small incisions. In the same operation, the pelvic endometriosis implants are removed — and, when indicated, the uterus, tubes and ovaries — and the bowel is treated with one of three techniques: shaving (shaving the nodule off the wall without opening the bowel), disc resection (removing a disc of the wall and suturing it) or segmental resection (removing the bowel segment with the nodule and joining the ends). The technique depends on the size, depth and number of nodules.

Shaving, disc or segmental resection: which is best?+

No single technique is best for everyone. Shaving has fewer complications (mean rate 2.2%) and less rectovaginal fistula, but more recurrence; disc and segmental resection have more complications (9.7% and 9.9%) and less recurrence. In the ENDORE randomized trial, conservative surgery and segmental resection showed no statistically significant difference in bowel and urinary function at 2 or at 10 years. The choice is made for each nodule.

Is robotic surgery better for bowel endometriosis?+

Studies show results equivalent to laparoscopy, not better: in the LAROSE randomized trial there was no difference in complications or conversion, and in the colorectal endometriosis meta-analyses robotics took about 20 minutes longer, with no difference in blood loss, length of stay or complications. There is a favorable signal for urinary function (dysfunction in 4.4% vs 13.3%), not yet confirmed in a randomized trial. Robotics may make deep pelvic dissection easier; the choice is made case by case.

Can the uterus and ovaries be removed in the same operation?+

Yes, when indicated — and Dr. Solon performs these procedures in the same operation as the bowel stage, by laparoscopy or robotic surgery. ESHRE considers hysterectomy in women who no longer wish to conceive and have not responded to more conservative treatments, noting that it does not necessarily cure the disease. Removing the ovaries reduces recurrence but induces surgical menopause, with long-term consequences that need to be weighed; adding hysterectomy to a bowel resection also raises the risk of major complications.

Why remove the appendix during endometriosis surgery?+

Because endometriosis often involves the appendix: it was found in 39.0% of women with deep endometriosis who had the appendix removed and in 35.8% of patients with bowel resection and routine appendectomy, with no complications attributed to it. The recommendations advise inspecting the appendix in every deep endometriosis operation; removal is discussed case by case.

Can endometriosis come back after surgery?+

It can. Recurrence is higher after shaving than after segmental resection, and in ENDORE 32.7% of patients had further endometriosis-related surgery within 10 years. Hormonal treatment after surgery lowers the risk: in a meta-analysis of women who kept at least one ovary, hormonal suppression started within 6 weeks of surgery reduced recurrence (RR 0.41).

Is pregnancy possible after surgery?+

Many patients become pregnant. In a meta-analysis of 48 studies with 5,963 patients with bowel endometriosis, the cumulative pregnancy rate after surgery was 56%; in ENDORE, 85.3% of those who wished to conceive did so, most of them naturally. The choice between surgery and assisted reproduction should not be automatic: it is individual and made with reproductive medicine.

Is bowel endometriosis surgery dangerous?+

It is major surgery with known risks that are discussed beforehand: major complications occurred in 13.5% of 755 colorectal resections in a US database — 9.9% by laparoscopy and 20.4% by open surgery — and in the French series of 1,135 patients, rectovaginal fistula occurred in 2.7% and anastomotic leak in 0.8% of all cases. The technique and the approach are chosen to balance disease control and these risks.

How long are the hospital stay and recovery?+

It depends on the extent of surgery: the stay is shorter after shaving and longer after disc or segmental resection, when diet is reintroduced gradually. At a Brazilian referral center, with 76 patients, the hospital stay was 2 days without segmental resection and 4 days with it. Light activities are resumed gradually over the following weeks, and physical effort is cleared according to healing. If a protective stoma was created, it is closed in a second, planned operation.

Do you operate through the SUS, the Brazilian public health system?+

This channel is for my private practice. Through the SUS, care does not go through my private practice: the only way to be operated on through the SUS is to go to the health post or Basic Health Unit nearest your home, be assessed by a doctor and, if indicated, be placed in your municipality's regulation queue. The surgeon does not choose the order of who gets operated on through the SUS — the queue is followed strictly, according to SUS rules. I am a Professor of Surgery at the School of Medicine of the Federal University of Uberlândia and I operate on SUS patients at the university hospital, HC-UFU, but it is not possible to schedule your care directly with me through these websites or contacts.

WHERE WE OPERATE

Hospital facilities in Uberlândia, Brazil.

Hospital Mater Dei Santa Genoveva

Av. Vasconcelos Costa, 967 — Martins, Uberlândia-MG

Open in Google Maps →

Hospital UMC

Rua Rafael Marino Neto, 600 — Jardim Karaíba, Uberlândia-MG

Open in Google Maps →

Want to schedule your evaluation?

Message Dr. Solon Gonçalves's team now on WhatsApp and schedule your appointment.

Book Appointment

Content reviewed by Dr. Solon Gonçalves Souza Menezes — CRM-MG 79366, RQE 60355 (GI Surgery), RQE 44656 (General Surgery). Professor of Surgery at FAMED-UFU and Supervisor of the General Surgery Medical Residency Program at HC-UFU. Full Member of the Brazilian College of Surgeons (TCBC). ORCID. Last reviewed: October/2026.

References
  1. Dave HB, Chamié LP, Young SW, et al. Bowel Endometriosis: Systematic Approach to Diagnosis with US and MRI. Radiographics. 2025;45(4):e240102. doi:10.1148/rg.240102
  2. Roman H; FRIENDS group. A national snapshot of the surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum and colon in France in 2015: a multicenter series of 1135 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;46(2):159-165. doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2016.09.004
  3. Barchi LC, Callado GY, Machado RB, et al. Intestinal endometriosis: outcomes from a multidisciplinary specialized referral center. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024;37:e1806. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11216408/
  4. Gerges B, Li W, Leonardi M, et al. Optimal imaging modality for detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;58(2):190-200. doi:10.1002/uog.23148
  5. Maderuelo S, Satorres E, Arrufat T, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound with bowel preparation versus transvaginal ultrasound with bowel preparation and water contrast for diagnosing recto-sigmoid endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;297:233-240. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.04.015
  6. Goncalves MO, Podgaec S, Dias JA Jr, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography with bowel preparation is able to predict the number of lesions and rectosigmoid layers affected in cases of deep endometriosis, defining surgical strategy. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(3):665-671. doi:10.1093/humrep/dep433
  7. Andres MP, Mendes RFP, Hernandes C, et al. Hormone treatment as first line therapy is safe and relieves pelvic pain in women with bowel endometriosis. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2019;17(2):eAO4583. doi:10.31744/einstein_journal/2019AO4583
  8. Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, et al.; ESHRE Endometriosis Guideline Group. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022;2022(2):hoac009 (full text: PMC8951218). doi:10.1093/hropen/hoac009
  9. Working group of ESGE, ESHRE and WES; Keckstein J, Becker CM, Canis M, et al. Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Part 2: deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020(1):hoaa002 (full text: PMC7013143). doi:10.1093/hropen/hoaa002
  10. Arcoverde FVL, Andres MP, Borrelli GM, et al. Surgery for endometriosis improves major domains of quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(2):266-278. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.774
  11. Riiskjær M, Forman A, Kesmodel US, et al. Pelvic pain and quality of life before and after laparoscopic bowel resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis: a prospective, observational study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61(2):221-229. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000970
  12. Nasseri Y, Ma R, Fani N, et al. The impact of surgeon speciality on surgical outcomes following colorectal resection for endometriosis. Colorectal Dis. 2025;27(2):e70028. doi:10.1111/codi.70028
  13. Roman H, Chanavaz-Lacheray I, Ballester M, et al. High postoperative fertility rate following surgical management of colorectal endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(9):1669-1676. doi:10.1093/humrep/dey146
  14. Shakiba K, Bena JF, McGill KM, et al. Surgical treatment of endometriosis: a 7-year follow-up on the requirement for further surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(6):1285-1292. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181758ec6
  15. Meyer R, Nasseri YY, Barnajian M, et al. Risk factors for major complications following colorectal resections for endometriosis in the USA. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023;39(1):1. doi:10.1007/s00384-023-04577-5
  16. Namnoum AB, Hickman TN, Goodman SB, et al. Incidence of symptom recurrence after hysterectomy for endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1995;64(5):898-902. doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57899-6
  17. Parker WH, Broder MS, Chang E, et al. Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy and long-term health outcomes in the Nurses' Health Study. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(5):1027-1037. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a11c64
  18. Moulder JK, Siedhoff MT, Melvin KL, et al. Risk of appendiceal endometriosis among women with deep-infiltrating endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;139(2):149-154. doi:10.1002/ijgo.12286
  19. Guo C, Chen MZ, Chiu T, et al. The appendix in endometriosis. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023;63(6):792-796. doi:10.1111/ajo.13730
  20. Burks C, Lee M, DeSarno M, et al. Excision versus ablation for management of minimal to mild endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(3):587-597. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.028
  21. Abesadze E, Sehouli J, Mechsner S, et al. Possible role of the posterior compartment peritonectomy, as a part of the complex surgery, regarding recurrence rate, improvement of symptoms and fertility rate in patients with endometriosis, long-term follow-up. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(5):1103-1111. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.08.019
  22. Knabben L, Imboden S, Fellmann B, et al. Urinary tract endometriosis in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis: prevalence, symptoms, management, and proposal for a new clinical classification. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(1):147-152. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.028
  23. Barra F, Scala C, Biscaldi E, et al. Ureteral endometriosis: a systematic review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, risk of malignant transformation and fertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24(6):710-730. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmy027
  24. Roman H, Bridoux V, Merlot B, et al. Risk of rectovaginal fistula in women with excision of deep endometriosis requiring concomitant vaginal and rectal sutures, with or without preventive stoma: a before-and-after comparative study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022;29(1):56-64.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2021.06.013
  25. Roman H, Bubenheim M, Huet E, et al. Conservative surgery versus colorectal resection in deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: a randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(1):47-57. doi:10.1093/humrep/dex336
  26. Roman H, Maria Davidescu AA, Crestani A, et al. Long term outcomes of surgical management of rectal endometriosis: 10-year follow-up of patients enrolled in a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2026 (online ahead of print). doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2026.07.007
  27. Bendifallah S, Puchar A, Vesale E, et al. Surgical outcomes after colorectal surgery for endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(3):453-466. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.015
  28. Bendifallah S, Vesale E, Daraï E, et al. Recurrence after surgery for colorectal endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(2):441-451.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.791
  29. O'Brien L, Morarasu S, Morarasu BC, et al. Conservative surgery versus colorectal resection for endometriosis with rectal involvement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical and long-term outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023;38(1):55. doi:10.1007/s00384-023-04352-6
  30. Coll S, Hurni Y, Barbany-Freixa N, et al. Low anterior resection syndrome in patients undergoing bowel segmental resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis: a retrospective long-term follow-up study. Colorectal Dis. 2025;27(5):e70113. doi:10.1111/codi.70113
  31. Madar A, Crestani A, Eraud P, et al. Voiding dysfunction after surgery for colorectal deep infiltrating endometriosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg. 2025;77(3):739-748. doi:10.1007/s13304-025-02124-1
  32. Roman H, Bridoux V, Merlot B, et al. Risk of bowel fistula following surgical management of deep endometriosis of the rectosigmoid: a series of 1102 cases. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(7):1601-1611. doi:10.1093/humrep/deaa131
  33. Soto E, Luu TH, Liu X, et al. Laparoscopy vs. robotic surgery for endometriosis (LAROSE): a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(4):996-1002.e3. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.033
  34. Zhang X, Zhang X. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic surgery and traditional laparoscopy for colorectal endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Robot Surg. 2025;19(1):239. doi:10.1007/s11701-025-02374-6
  35. Servidoni ACP, Tristão LS, Lemos MJ, et al. The robotic trade-off in endometriosis surgery: robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopy — a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2026 (online ahead of print). doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2026.09.469
  36. Madar A, Ferrier C, Dabi Y, et al. Voiding dysfunction after robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for colorectal endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2026 (online ahead of print). doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2026.07.026
  37. Verrelli L, Merlot B, Chanavaz-Lacheray I, et al. Robotic surgery for severe endometriosis: a preliminary comparative study of cost estimation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024;31(2):95-101.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2023.11.002
  38. Shugaba A, Lambert JE, Bampouras TM, et al. Should all minimal access surgery be robot-assisted? A systematic review into the musculoskeletal and cognitive demands of laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022;26(7):1520-1530. doi:10.1007/s11605-022-05319-8
  39. Larraín D, Heredia F, Maisto MLÁ, et al. Cumulative pregnancy rates among patients with bowel endometriosis according to therapeutic approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2026;33(5):527-545. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2025.12.009
  40. Zakhari A, Delpero E, McKeown S, et al. Endometriosis recurrence following post-operative hormonal suppression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2021;27(1):96-107. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmaa033